assessing peace

how do we know how people are doing?

what are the processes and social impacts our community needs to build peace and trust with one another?

pl

what i can offer

i offer a range of processes to meet the needs and goals of each community.

have something particular in mind?

i’d be happy to work with you to create a custom plan.

the peace poles©

  • the Peace Poles are a comprehensive measurement framework — a set of over one hundred concrete, data-driven measures — designed to assess not just whether violence is absent, but whether the conditions for genuine human flourishing are actually present. Think of them as a community health check-up, except instead of measuring blood pressure and cholesterol, they measure the health of the systems, spaces, cultures, and structures that allow people to live well together.

    the Peace Poles translate decades of peace research into something that communities, city planners, policymakers, and grassroots organizers can actually use.

  • They Make the Invisible Visible

    For decades, peacebuilders have worked hard in communities — running dialogue circles, mediating conflicts, building trust. But a persistent challenge has been the difficulty of measuring whether this work is actually making a difference. The Peace Poles provide that missing tool. They give practitioners and researchers 103 concrete, data-linked measures that can be tracked over time, showing what is improving, what is not, and where attention is most needed.

    They Connect Fields That Have Been Working in Isolation

    City planners, architects, peace researchers, economists, community organizers — all of these fields have been working on pieces of the same puzzle without a shared language. The Peace Poles provide that language. By mapping the connections between the built environment, cultural dynamics, economic conditions, and political structures, the framework allows professionals across disciplines to coordinate and collaborate in ways that were previously very difficult.

    They Address Root Causes, Not Just Symptoms

    Most responses to community conflict and violence focus on the event itself — the crime, the riot, the broken relationship. The Peace Poles are designed to work upstream of those events, identifying and measuring the structural and environmental conditions that make violence more or less likely to emerge in the first place. The Peace and Conflict Studies field calls this proventive peacebuilding. It is active, long-term, peace ecosystem care. This is prevention at its most effective: not putting out fires, but asking why fires keep starting.

  • For all the progress humanity has made, we still live in a world where the dominant frameworks for addressing conflict and building community are reactive, fragmented, and often paternalistic. Large institutions — governments, international organizations, development agencies — frequently operate with well-intentioned but top-down approaches that do not reflect the needs, traditions, and knowledge of the communities they are trying to help.

    At the same time, the grassroots movements and community organizations doing the most effective peacebuilding work on the ground have lacked the measurement tools to demonstrate their impact, justify continued funding, or persuade institutions to adopt their approaches at scale.

    The Gap The Peace Poles Fill

    They bridge between the rigor that institutions require and the lived, community-centered wisdom that effective peacebuilding demands. They give grassroots peacebuilders the language of evidence, and they give institutions the depth of community reality.

  • We are living through a particular moment in history when the frameworks we use to understand peace, conflict, and community are under enormous stress — and in some cases, actively breaking down.

    Rising Polarization and Eroding Social Trust

    Across the globe, communities are experiencing sharp rises in political polarization, distrust between groups, and the erosion of the shared narratives that make cooperation possible. These are precisely the conditions the Peace Poles are designed to detect and address — not after they have exploded into open conflict, but while there is still time to intervene.

    Cities Are Where It All Comes Together

    More than half of the world's population now lives in cities, a number expected to double by 2050. Cities are where political, cultural, economic, and spatial conditions converge most intensely. They are also where inequality, displacement, climate stress, and social fragmentation are most visible. The Peace Poles — and particularly the Spatial Peace Pole — offer city planners, mayors, and community developers a framework directly applicable to the urban environments where so much of the future of peace will be determined.

    Peace Research Is Ready for Its Practical Turn

    The field of Peace and Conflict Studies has spent decades building a rich body of theory. What has lagged behind is actionable, measurable practice — tools that allow researchers and practitioners to say with confidence: here is what we are measuring, here is what the data shows, here is what we should do next. The Peace Poles represent that practical turn arriving. They are among the first tools in the field to offer this kind of rigorous, multi-dimensional measurement framework.

    The Cost of Inaction Is Accelerating

    Climate change, economic disruption, mass displacement, and the ongoing legacies of colonialism and structural racism are compounding. The communities that are least equipped to weather these pressures are those that already have the lowest levels of positive peace — the weakest institutions, the most fractured social fabric, the most degraded built environments. The Peace Poles offer a way to identify these vulnerabilities early and mobilize collective action to address them before they reach a breaking point.

scales of analysis

The Peace Poles Assessment is priced by scale — the size and complexity of the community being assessed — and by the depth of community voice integration required. Fees reflect the genuine time and expertise required to produce rigorous, defensible findings at each scale: not consulting day rates inflated by overhead, but value-based pricing that reflects what the assessment produces.

  • $5,500 – $9,500 per assessment

    timeline: 6 – 8 weeks

    • Full indicator assessment calibrated to school or institutional context — typically 16–20 of the 23 indicators applicable at this scale

    • Environmental scan: one or more site visits observing spatial peace conditions across the physical environment

    • Community voice: structured listening sessions or focus groups with students (minimum 2), staff (minimum 1), and families/community members (minimum 1)

    • Data collection from available school-level sources: climate surveys, attendance data, disciplinary records, facilities data

    • Peace Poles Assessment Report (15–22 pages): four-pole profile, indicator-level findings, community voice synthesis, and visual peace profile map

    • Priority Recommendations (6–8 actions across all four poles, organized by urgency and investment level)

    • Executive Summary (2 pages) formatted for board, funders, and public communication

    • Presentation of findings to school leadership team (in person or remote, 60–90 minutes)

    Optional: classroom use of assessment process as a Peace 101/201/301/401 curriculum activity (see Section 5)

  • $11,000 – $20,000 per assessment

    Timeline: 8 – 12 weeks

    • Full 23-indicator assessment calibrated to neighborhood scale — including spatial mapping of walkability, connectivity, access to nature, and environmental stressors across the geographic area

    • GIS-assisted spatial analysis: mapping of relevant spatial peace indicators against neighborhood geography

    • Community voice: minimum 3 facilitated listening sessions across different population segments; structured interviews with 10–20 community stakeholders; optional survey instrument (250+ respondents)

    • Data integration from neighborhood-level sources: census tract data, crime data, health outcomes, walk scores, transit access, green space mapping, income distribution

    • Peace Poles Assessment Report (25–40 pages): four-pole profile with neighborhood-level analysis, spatial peace maps, demographic disaggregation of indicator findings, community voice synthesis

    • Visualization package: spatial peace maps, indicator score charts, and comparative charts formatted for public communication

    • Priority Recommendations (8–12 actions with implementation pathway and resource estimates)

    • Executive Summary (3–4 pages) formatted for city agencies, funders, and community organizations

    • Presentation to community stakeholders and/or city officials (in person; up to 90 minutes)

  • $28,000 – $55,000 per assessment

    Timeline: 12 – 20 weeks

    • Full 23-indicator assessment at city scale — all four poles assessed with city-level and neighborhood-disaggregated analysis

    • Comprehensive spatial analysis: GIS mapping of all spatial peace indicators across city geography with equity disaggregation by neighborhood and demographic group

    • Community voice at scale: minimum 6 facilitated listening sessions across diverse neighborhoods and populations; stakeholder interviews (30–50); citywide survey instrument (500+ respondents); optional demographic oversampling to ensure representative voice from historically underrepresented communities

    • Full secondary data integration: census, crime, health, economic, environmental, and civic participation data; longitudinal comparison where available

    • Peace Poles Assessment Report (50–80 pages): comprehensive four-pole analysis; city-level and neighborhood-level profiles; demographic equity analysis; longitudinal trend analysis where baseline data exists

    • Public Dashboard Brief: 4–6 page visual summary of city peace profile, formatted for public release and media communication

    • Policy Recommendation Brief (10–15 pages): prioritized policy recommendations across all four poles with implementation pathways, department ownership, and success indicators

    • Presentations: leadership briefing (mayor's office / city council); public community presentation; optional media briefing

    • Research partnership option: assessment data contributes to Cultures of Peace positive peace longitudinal research

  • $4,500 – $8,000 per assessment

    Timeline: 6 – 8 weeks

    • Adapted indicator set calibrated to organizational context — typically 14–18 of the 23 indicators applicable and measurable within an organizational setting

    • Environmental scan of organizational physical space: assessment of spatial peace conditions in offices, meeting rooms, public-facing spaces

    • Community voice: structured listening sessions with staff, leadership, clients/constituents, and community partners; anonymous staff survey component

    • Data integration from organizational sources: HR data, client outcomes, community feedback, geographic footprint, program reach

    • Peace Poles Assessment Report (12–18 pages): four-pole organizational profile, spatial peace assessment, community voice synthesis, and organizational peace culture analysis

    • Priority Recommendations (6–8 actions) with implementation guidance for organizational leadership

    • Executive Summary formatted for board presentation and funder reporting

    • Presentation to organizational leadership (in person or remote, 60 minutes)

why measure peace

A school that wants to understand its actual conditions of peace — not just absence of behavioral incidents — uses the assessment to identify where students feel unsafe, unseen, or disconnected. Results inform school improvement planning, capital investment decisions, and grant applications. Annual tracking shows whether investments are actually changing peace conditions.

schools or school districts

Pre-design: a peace poles assessment of the project site and surrounding community generates the social and spatial baseline that the design must address. Post-occupancy: a follow-up assessment measures whether the completed building is producing the social outcomes it was designed for — essential for ESG reporting and funder accountability. (See Spatial Peace Consulting Fee Structure for pricing of assessment within architecture engagements.)

architecture and design firms

Organizations measuring their social impact — for board reporting, grant applications, or strategic planning — use the Peace Poles Assessment to demonstrate rigorous, peer-reviewed-methodology evidence of community peace outcomes. The assessment satisfies funder requirements for social impact documentation that anecdotal reporting and participant satisfaction surveys cannot.

non-profits and community foundations

The assessment methodology is grounded in peer-reviewed research and can be adapted for academic research partnerships. Researchers using the Peace Poles framework in their own work may engage Dr. Lindsay as a methodology consultant, co-investigator, or partner for comparative analysis across sites.

academic researchers and policy institutes

Cities and civic organizations use the assessment as an evidence base for community investment decisions, policy development, and grant reporting. A municipal peace profile disaggregated by neighborhood reveals where structural peace gaps are largest and which populations are most affected. The assessment translates the concept of "safe and thriving city" into measurable indicators that can anchor policy goals.

municipal governments and civic organizations

Organizations whose explicit mission is peacebuilding need evidence that their work is moving the conditions that matter. The Peace Poles Assessment provides a before/after or longitudinal measurement tool that can be presented to funders, boards, and community stakeholders as a credible account of organizational impact.

community peace centers and peacebuilding organizations

my process

plan with purpose

together, we outline a path forward that’s realistic, strategic, and tailored to your communities’ specific needs.

actively collaborate

you’re part of the process. we keep communication open and decisions shared—no black boxes or surprises.

what did we miss

every project and process is different. we stay flexible and responsive to make sure the process fits your flow—not the other way around.

how do we know

when we assess, it’s not just a finished report—it’s a set of solutions you can trust and measure, backed with real care and community intention.

  • peace is not a destination we arrive at once and then maintain passively. it is a living process — an ongoing, active weaving together of the political, cultural, economic, and spatial conditions that allow people to flourish. like an old-growth forest, it is the product of countless interdependent relationships, growing slowly and requiring sustained care.

  • the work is hard. healing takes time and space. our role is to draw it out — the desires, the wisdom, the reconciliation already waiting in the room.

  • cultures of peace are the invisible tissue between us all.

let’s build peace together

if you're interested in working with me, complete the form with a few details about your community. i'll review your message and get back to you soon.